Happenings

/
Ethics in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Initiative for the Asia Pacific
9th December 2019 (Monday)
Overview

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technological developments pose intricate and complex ethical questions that the industry alone cannot answer. Important research questions in the application of AI should be dealt with not only by companies building and deploying the technology, but also by independent academic research institutions. The latter are best equipped to pursue interdisciplinary research that will benefit society.

To help support rigorous and groundbreaking academic research in these areas, Facebook is collaborating with the Centre for Civil Society and Governance of The University of Hong Kong and the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong (esteemed co-chair of the ICDPPC Permanent Working Group on Ethics and Data Protection in AI) to launch a Research Initiative to advance Ethics in Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Asia Pacific region that takes into account different disciplinary perspectives. This line of research will also complement Facebook’s efforts that bolster independent research being done in these areas, like the TUM Institute for Ethics in AI and similar Research Awards offered in other countries and regions, such as India and Latin America.

The Research Initiative, through a Request for Proposals (RFP), will result in the production of papers from academic institutions, think tanks, and research organizations registered and operational across the Asia Pacific region. Proposals will be reviewed by a selection committee, and the entities whose proposals are selected will receive a research grant.

Research Themes
  • Policy makers are emphasizing the need for ethics by design (see ICDPPC Declaration on Ethics and Data Protection in Artificial Intelligence here). What kinds of policy actions or regimes can foster academia and industry to collaborate for promoting and advancing ethics by design practices and frameworks?
  • How can developers and companies ensure that their AI systems are explainable, what is the purpose of the latter, and what does it entail?
  • How can academia help companies and governments better understand and operationalize ethics within their own sectors and activities? How can academia both inspire and build on industry best practices for responsible and ethical development of AI?
  • How can developers and companies ensure that their AI systems and applications are built in a fair and unbiased way? How should social science and humanities questions around fairness and discrimination be embedded into the technical design of AI? What best practices can we advance in this space?
  • How can developers and companies ensure that their AI systems are transparent to the affected individuals in a meaningful way? (For example: how will a person know whether he or she is being unfairly discriminated against because of an automated decision?)
  • What level of autonomy or control should be provided to the affected individuals concerning the use of AI without compromising the legitimate purposes of AI, and how should the control be provided?

2) Governance

  • How do formal legal instruments, including existing and proposed legislation, and ethical AI governance frameworks (informal) interact and mutually influence each other? Does the former stem or preempt the latter, and are they complementary or competing?
  • What is the role of Ethical Codes in the broader regulatory landscape? How should they relate to laws and regulations (either existing or being debated)?
  • What is the role of academia in 1) promoting research on AI Governance Frameworks; 2) analyzing, anticipating, and identifying gaps in legislation and other governance models related to AI development and use; and 3) articulating best practices to guide ethical and innovative uses of data?

3) AI Ethics & Diversity

  • How should AI developers and companies foster and apply a multicultural approach to the ethical design of AI?
  • How can we reconcile and strike a balance between the benefits of a global approach to the need to acknowledge important particularities and differences stemming from companies’ regional user base?
  • What would be a sound and scalable methodology for researchers and product developers to recognize and solve ethical challenges, while leveraging different regional perspectives?

To Apply

The Request For Proposals is open to academic institutions, think tanks, and research organizations registered and operational in the Asia Pacific region. The questions and themes under each of the 3 key areas below are just examples of possible research questions. Applicants are encouraged to come up with their own proposals and to leverage, as much as possible, regional context and local examples in their submissions.

We ask applicants to submit a 2-3-page proposal. The proposal should include:

  • A research question and a clear statement of work that can be completed within 6 months of award. Applicants are encouraged to leverage, as much as possible, regional context and local examples in their submissions.
  • A summary of the project (1-2 pages) explaining the area of focus, a description of techniques, relevant prior work, and a timeline with milestones and expected outcomes (recall that the timeline should not be more than 6 months)
  • A draft budget description (<1 page) including an approximate cost of the award and explanation of how funds would be spent. Proposals are highly encouraged to focus funding on project personnel, especially PhD students. Proposals from small collaborative teams are also encouraged. The proposed budget should be within USD 30,000 (overhead is typically limited to 5-8%). Please note that in the submission form you will be asked to provide the requested amount in USD.
  • Name(s) of the researcher(s) involved in the proposed work with their CV/resume.
  • Indication of any previous or current connections/collaborations with Facebook (in which case, please provide context and name the Facebook contacts).
  • Successful awardees will be listed on the Facebook Research website and will be encouraged to openly publish any findings/insights from their work. Research findings will also serve as the basis for discussions for a workshop to be held in Hong Kong in September/ October 2020 and in Germany in November 2020.
  • Applications should be submitted by 31 January 2020.
  • Enquiries may be directed to Miss Jass WU (ccsg@hku.hk).
Eligibility
  • Organizations must be a nonprofit or non-governmental organization with recognized legal status in their respective country (equal to 501(c)(3) status under the United States Internal Revenue Code) and should comply with the applicable laws to receive foreign funds in their respective country.
  • Applicants must be the Principal Investigator on any resulting award.
  • Each applicant may submit one proposal per solicitation.

Timeline and DatesSteps to submit a proposal:

Request For Proposals: 9 December 2019
Submission deadline: 31 January 2020
Selection of proposals: February to March 2020 (Due to the overwhelming number of applications, the assessment period is now extended to March 2020.)
Notification of result: May 2020
Fund disbursement: 2nd Quarter of 2020 (Payment will be made to the applicant’s host institution as an unrestricted gift. The process will start in Q2.)
Online Roundtable: 10 September 2021 (Details and Registration)
Discussion Workshop at the Technical University of Munich: December 2021
Receipt of research papers: 1st Quarter of 2022
Terms and conditions
  • By submitting a proposal, you are authorizing Facebook and the Centre for Civil Society and Governance to evaluate the proposal for a potential award, and you agree to the terms herein.
  • You agree that Facebook and the Centre for Civil Society and Governance will not be required to treat any part of the proposal as confidential or protected by copyright.
  • You agree and acknowledge that personal data submitted with the proposal, including name, mailing address, phone number, and email address of you and other named researchers in the proposal may be collected, processed, stored and otherwise used by Facebook and the Centre for Civil Society and Governance for the purposes of administering the website and evaluating the contents of the proposal.
  • You acknowledge that neither party is obligated to enter into any business transaction as a result of the proposal submission, Facebook or the Centre for Civil Society and Governance is under no obligation to review or consider the proposal, and neither party acquires any intellectual property rights as a result of submitting the proposal.

  • Any feedback you provide to Facebook or the Centre for Civil Society and Governance in the proposal regarding its products or services will not be treated as confidential or protected by copyright, and Facebook and the Centre for Civil Society and Governance is free to use such feedback on an unrestricted basis with no compensation to you.

Vetting Committee Member
Professor Wai-Fung Lam (Director, Centre for Civil Society and Governance, HKU)
Wai-Fung (Danny) Lam is Director of the Centre for Civil Society and Governance (CCSG), and Professor in Public Administration at the University of Hong Kong. He finished his undergraduate study at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and received a Ph.D. in Public Policy from Indiana University, Bloomington. Professor Lam is an expert in common-pool resource management, institutional policy analysis, public governance, and civil society. His research has focused on the design of efficient institutional arrangements for the governance and management of public resources, a core issue in public administration and sustainable development. Professor Lam has served on the editorial committees of Public Administration Review (PAR), International Review of Administrative Sciences (IRAS), Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis (JCPA), Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (NVSQ), and Asian Politics and Policy (APP), and is co-editor of The Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration (APJPA).
Professor Lisa Ellis (Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Otago)
Lisa Ellis is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Philosophy, Politics, and Economics programme at the University of Otago. Lisa’s work investigates how we can make policy decisions that serve our interests in flourishing now and in the future. Her current project, “the collective implications of discrete decisions,” includes papers in environmental democracy, the collective ethics of flying, the value of biodiversity losses, climate adaptation justice, and species extinction. She has written two books and edited a volume of essays on the political philosophy of Immanuel Kant; other work in the history of political thought includes essays on Hobbes, social contract theory, and modernity. Lisa is past president of the Association for Political Theory and former editor of the political theory section of the Journal of Politics. Lisa’s work has been supported by the Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton), the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, and New Zealand’s Deep South National Science Challenge.
Commissioner Stephen Kai-yi Wong (Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong)
Mr. Stephen Wong is the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data of Hong Kong and has been in private practice as a barrister-at-law specialising in public law. On top of overseeing the fair enforcement of data protection law, he promotes the education and publicity of data protection in order to construct a culture of respect for personal data privacy which maintains a proper balance between free flow of information and data protection without unduly compromising ICT and economic development.
Professor Haksoo Ko (Professor, School of Law, Seoul National University)
Haksoo Ko is Professor of Law at Seoul National University School of Law in Seoul, Korea. He primarily teaches areas in Law and Economics as well as in Data Privacy and Artificial Intelligence Law. He regularly sits on various advisory boards and committees for the Korean government, legislature, and judiciary. He currently serves as President of Asian Law and Economics Association; Director of SNU Center for Law and Economics; Director of SNU Asia-Pacific Law Institute; and Associate Director of SNU AI Institute. In 2017, he launched SNU AI Policy Initiative and currently serves as its co-director.
Dr. Norberto Andrade (Global Policy Lead for Digital & AI Ethics, Facebook)
Norberto Andrade is Facebook’s Global Policy Lead for Digital and AI Ethics. He is also Professor at IE Law School, and an Affiliated Scholar at Stanford Law School – Center for Internet & Society (CIS). Previously, Andrade was a Postdoctoral Research Scholar at UC Berkeley School of Law, where he worked at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology (BCLT); a Legal Foresight Fellow at The Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law; and a Visiting Scholar at the Singapore Internet Research Centre of Nanyang Technological University. Andrade has also held corporate positions in policy and privacy at Mozilla and Workday, and scientific research roles at the European Commission. Andrade holds a PhD in Law, Policy and Technology from the European University Institute (Italy), and he has successfully published numerous academic articles, reports and book chapters in the field of Law & Technology.

Category :   Event

Other Happenings
Event
The APHEN-ICH 2026 International Forum and General Meeting in Hanoi
2026/08/24
Preserving Living Heritage in the Asia-Pacific: The APHEN-ICH 2026 International Forum and General Meeting in Hanoi In August 2026, with our colleague Daisy Yeung’s presence, the Centre participated in the APHEN-ICH 2026 International Forum and General Meeting held at Vietnam National University (VNU), Hanoi. Over three days, we immersed in conversations with heritage practitioners, researchers, and community innovators, exploring the theme of Living Heritage and Cultural Industries in the Asia-Pacific: Community Creativity, Sustainable Transmission, and Cultural Innovation. Day 1: Navigating and Sustaining Heritage Discussions centred on how communities are creatively adapting Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) through local craft villages, heritage tourism, and digital innovation. What struck us most was the honesty of the practitioners, grappling openly with real tensions: balancing economic benefit with cultural authenticity, and encouraging generational transmission amidst modern career pressures. Rather than viewing marketisation and technology as threats to cultural authenticity, the forum highlighted how creative enterprise can be powerful for transmitting heritage knowledge to younger generations, using digital tools and new market channels,. Day 2: Youth Engagement and the General Meeting The second day speeches focused on youth, ICH and creative futures. The conversation with VNU students showcased their genuine passion for heritage work and a fresh, creative vision for its future. The afternoon APHEN-ICH General Meeting focused on discussing the network's strategic direction for 2026–2028, followed by  a heartfully warm farewell dinner hosted by our VNU colleagues. Day 3: Field Trips to Traditional Craft Villages The forum truly came alive during visits to the Đông Hồ folk painting village and Bát Tràng pottery village. We met a young villager working in community-initiated museums, leading guided tours with passion. He was even developing multilingual self-guided tour elements to make heritage accessible to new audiences — a brilliant example of local youth actively shaping how traditions thrive in the 21st century. When we visited artisans' homes, we heard something you don't find in academic papers: the vulnerability of their position, their pride in their craft, and their pragmatic creativity in adapting the contemporary markets. These exchanges reaffirmed that sustainable transmission it's not about freezing heritage in amber, but enabling communities to choose, adapt and evolve their practices. Looking Forward Our centre recognise that universities must serve as bridges, connecting heritage communities with resources, research support, and platforms for amplifying their voices; supporting young scholars and practitioners in heritage work; and generating knowledge that informs policy and practice. We're energized to deepen our engagement with the APHEN-ICH network and continue to create platforms for dialogue between academics, policymakers, and heritage communities.
Learn more
Organization
Advancing Sustainability Education Through Industry-Relevant Learning
2026/09/09
HKU's Master of Social Sciences in Sustainability Leadership and Governance (SLG) programme prepares future leaders to tackle sustainability challenges through interdisciplinary, practical learning. As part of this commitment, we partner with CFA Institute to enhance students’ exposure to industry-recognized knowledge in sustainable investing and ESG integration — bridging academic learning with real-world application. HKU SLG students, alumni, and staff also enjoy special pricing on the Sustainable Investing Certificate. Learn more: https://store.cfainstitute.org/b2b/CCSG/2c352f5899e8174cf1999ded0e419a3d/#/
Learn more
Event
Building an AI-Ready and Inclusive Talent Pipeline
2026/07/08
The Centre for Civil Society and Governance (CCSG) at HKU, through the “Jockey Club Collaborative Project for Inclusive Employment,” aims to harness innovation and technology (I&T) to support people with disabilities (PWD) and promote inclusive employment opportunities. In collaboration with GreenTomato, a leading digital transformation consultancy and AI solutions provider, we delivered a job tasting and discovery workshop for the social sector, students, PWD and industry practitioners. Participants learned about and explored how AI is reshaping job design, skill requirements, and inclusive hiring through interactive demonstrations, sharing session and a company tour. Key Highlights: AI localization and new roles: AI localization is creating new, accessible job opportunities, including AI Quality Support roles that align well with the strengths of PWD and SEN talent. Human-in-the-loop importance: Human oversight remains essential to ensure accuracy, compliance, and contextual judgment in AI applications. Shift to AI collaboration: As AI transforms the workplace, competitiveness is increasingly defined by the ability to collaborate with AI, prompting organizations to rethink job design and broaden their talent pipelines. At the Jockey Club Collaborative Project for Inclusive Employment, we are dedicated to fostering cross-sector collaborations that turn digital transformation into inclusive employment opportunities.
Learn more